9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Our Hours Mon. - Fri.


Call Us For Free Consultation



Calif. Pay-For-Delay Law Lacks Nuance

Tiomkin Law Offices of Elliott Tiomkin > Legal News  > Calif. Pay-For-Delay Law Lacks Nuance

Calif. Pay-For-Delay Law Lacks Nuance

Law360 (July 17, 2020, 6:11 PM EDT) — In January, the state of California enacted its new legislation, A.B. 824, making reverse payment patent settlements associated with Hatch-Waxman Act pharmaceutical litigation — or pay-for-delay settlements — presumptively anti-competitive.[1]

This law, which has been subject to legal challenges and is currently being appealed with oral arguments taking place earlier this month, differs from existing legal antitrust precedent established by a number of federal court cases as well as Federal Trade Commission enforcement policies.[2] This includes the U.S. Supreme Court’s ruling in FTC v. Actavis which established that a rule-of-reason analysis is to be used rather than assuming that “reverse payment…

Call Now ButtonCall For Free Consultation